2026-05-09

Endless Dreams 2026

“Then a person starts thinking about existence. This is where the world begins.” 

 
 Somewhere, spring is starting, and somewhere else, autumn is approaching. Somewhere it’s summer, and somewhere it’s winter. It’s like Europe and Australia: The world on this planet itself is so vast that the seasons are not the same everywhere. 

Recently, 

Sidney SN released Happs. The “happs” is within him. And so Sidney SN is here with the 

 Endless Dreams.  


Sometimes music captures everything exactly. I listen something, and I know precisely what I mean. Sometimes I think that music (for me, tech-house, progressive, trance, liquid DnB, hip hop, New Retro Wave and different music) itself should be the answer—and if someone doesn’t understand it, then they don’t understand anything that’s being said.  

But the World is too vast to be expressed by a single idea. Existence requires structures that don’t come from just one source...

  01. See the Ocean - a intro
  02. Bob x Subwave - Wait For Me
  03. Etherwood - Caliban
  04. Flava D - Womb Machine
  05. Y-Zer - 3rd Eye Lies
  06. Business As Usual & Liv Campbell - Light
  07. Alexvnder - What Do I Love
  08. [KSR] Dogger - Sweet Jungle
  09. Nymfo & Riya - Something Tells Me
 10. Bop & Unquote - Drifting Away
 11. Boxplot Remix - Leap Year Gal
 12. Fred V feat. Lottie Jones - Homesick
 13. Silence Groove, Arp Nova - Mauve
 14. SOLAH - Love For Me Too
 15. Lucidity- No More Tears
 16. LENS - Feels Like
 17. In:Most - Spectre
 18. Big Lou, Y-Zer - Glam & Glitter

Released 03/31/2026

2026-05-08

A world without human freedoms and rights

 The idea of equality carries within it a paradox that may ultimately lead to the denial of the human being itself. If people are naturally different, then every difference creates the potential for hierarchy. Differences in intellect, talent, ambition, creativity, or will create differences in influence. And differences in influence gradually create inequalities of power. The moment a society decides to eliminate all hierarchies completely, it comes into conflict with human nature itself.

Human beings are not static creatures. They long for growth, self-overcoming, creation, knowledge, and progress. Yet progress means movement forward, and movement forward creates differences between people. Some think faster, some create more, some lead, while others follow. Absolute equality therefore could not tolerate true individualism, because individualism itself is the source of inequality.

If a society without any hierarchy were to exist, it would have to control not only the economy or social relations, but human thought itself. Intellect would become a problem, because differences in intellect create differences in influence. Ambition would become a problem, because it creates movement and progress. Individuality would become a problem, because it disrupts the uniformity of equality. Such a society would have to constantly ensure that no one “stands out.”

This is where the similarity to Nineteen Eighty-Four emerges. Not necessarily in the form of a traditional state, but in the principle of absolute control in the name of a higher idea. In Orwell’s world, that idea is power. In a vision of absolute equality, equality itself could become the new authority, total power over mind of all beings. The control of language, the restriction of thought, and the suppression of individuality would not serve to protect the state, but to preserve the uniformity of society. 

The paradox of such a system is that the attempt to eliminate hierarchy creates a new and even deeper form of domination. Power would no longer exist only within institutions, but within the very principle of equality itself, which would define the limits of human expression. A person would cease to be a unique individual and instead become a function of the system. Individuality would be seen as a threat to the stability of the collective order. 

Equality lead not to the liberation of humanity, but to the removal of what makes humans human — difference, individuality, and intellectual freedom.