I once again asked AI questions about my favorite EU countries and Czechia.
The AI’s answers didn’t surprise me.
Finland • One of the safest and most stable countries in the world.
• High-quality education system, good healthcare.
• Beautiful nature (forests, lakes, Arctic Circle, clean air).
• Calmer pace of life, lots of space and privacy.
• High trust in institutions and low corruption.
Netherlands
• Cosmopolitan, open, and liberal society.
• Excellent infrastructure (bike paths, transport, logistics).
• Active cultural and music scene, many expats.
• High level of English – easy for foreigners.
• Milder climate, no extreme winters.
Germany
• Strong economy, high wages, large job market.
• Good infrastructure, healthcare, education.
• Cultural diversity, music and art scene.
• Central location in Europe – great accessibility.
• Strong protection of labor rights.
Luxembourg
• One of the highest standards of living and wages in the world.
• Stable and safe country.
• Multicultural environment, high share of foreigners.
• Excellent infrastructure, healthcare, and social system. • All buses, trams, and trains are free throughout Luxembourg, in 2nd class.
• English, French, and German – easy to communicate.
Belgium
• Good location (Brussels = center of the EU, close to France, Netherlands, Germany).
• Multicultural and open society.
• Quality healthcare and education.
• Rich history, culture, gastronomy.
• Good knowledge of languages (French, Dutch, English).
Czechia
• Interesting history and partially natural beauty.
• Cheaper life (cheap).
• Lower wages compared to Western Europe.
• Higher level of corruption and less trust in institutions.
• English and other languages not as widespread.
• Political culture and bureaucracy can be frustrating.
• Challenging real estate market.
AI’s judgment about me:
It seems that openness and quality of life matter a lot to you, along with cosmopolitanism and being at the European center. Czechia ends up last – probably because of lower wages, politics, and less openness. You put NL and LUX at the top for quality of life and openness. Germany is above Belgium – because it has a stronger economy and greater stability (even though Belgium has the EU advantage, Germany seems more practical). Finland - is more peace and nature. Czechia is last, because compared to the others, the quality of life is lower.
After longer comparison, the ranking is clear:
1️⃣ Netherlands – cosmopolitan, open, progressive. Great place if you seek freedom and an international environment. Housing sometimes more expensive, but quality of life is top.
2️⃣ Luxembourg – small country, but the standard of living and safety are among the best in the world. Stable institutions and high wages.
3️⃣ Germany – strong economy, job opportunities, central location. Bureaucracy and taxes are a downside, but still worth it.
4️⃣ Belgium – cultural mix, center of Europe. Political complexity and high costs of living reduce the experience a bit.
5️⃣ Finland – peace, nature, safety. Great for introverts, but long winters and isolation aren’t for everyone.
6️⃣ Czechia – has its history and forests, but honestly: low wages, weak institutions, politics, mentality. People’s mentality often pretty acts only for their own “benefit,” often dishonestly or selfishly, and that holds back social development and quality of life.
“End of the country is near!”
The same, in Czechia, I wasn’t surprised by the student elections either. The complete opposite of the older generation. This also, in my view, reflects what I’ve been saying about many high school students, students in Czechia. At school, they have a sense for progressivism and rights, but once they leave school, they are confronted with harsh reality, and are more likely forced to adapt to futility rather than to carry out their convictions. I’d like to be hopeful, that perhaps precisely because of this confrontation with reality in Czechia, this very reality could make them known, just as it did with me. In itself, this shows that things don’t work in Czechia, and someone with a good, interesting vision, ideas can quickly come to ruin or towards burnout syndrome. Yes, the Western world doesn’t understand because this is a different world.
The
result of the elections in the Czech Republic is both sad and seems to be like
absurdly comical. People who vote for own ostracism are, in fact, acting against themselves—as if they were voluntarily getting used to a Russian invasion, their own ostracism. On the other side are Germany and Western Europe, ready to defend their lives and lands, even if that means intervening in the Czech Republic. They are like a balloon stretched between two hands—constantly at risk of bursting. In this situation, it will be they themselves who pay the price for their absurdity. They will not matter to either side: one seeks power, while the others will defend themselves. The elections abroad only highlight this—
only in Russia did the same party win. In the end, like the silhouette of a popped balloon, only a
memory will remain on historical maps; the contents of the balloon will disappear. The Czech president was truthful when he said that he does not want a government that leaves the country at the mercy of Russia. However, someone is leaving it at the mercy of themselves.
In a way, I don’t understand why so many Czechs lean toward Babiš and similarly, when from the very beginning he has represented something that so many real Czechs condemned in the 1990s — large-scale privatization, for example. And, yeah, also monopolization of power.
A words of AI analysis:
Babiš didn’t move to Czechia out of sentiment — he moved out of strategy.
After the fall of communism, both Czechia and Slovakia opened to privatization, but Czechia offered a far larger and richer playground for ambitious businessmen. In the early 1990s, Babiš founded Agrofert in Prague as a subsidiary of the Slovak Petrimex, then quietly turned it into his own empire. When Czechoslovakia split, he stayed where the money and opportunity were — in Czechia. His move wasn’t about national roots; it was about building dominance in a newly forming market economy.
So it seems strange to me that so many people who claim to stand for the Czech Republic choose politicians whose interests have been different from the very beginning. It’s as if their jingling of keys in ’89 was fake. Because I grew up in the 1990s, in my opinion, during the 1990s Babiš and similarly wouldn’t have gained traction with people, because back then society was heading in a different direction after the fall of communism. To me, this also suggests that something has gone wrong, especially in the past ten years.
I also said, Sidney SN also drew influence from the vibes of countries like Australia, the Netherlands, … as well as from the very systems of existence themselves. These vibes are what made me known—you know about me because of them. I cannot allow anything that goes against this, nor can I allow anything that undermines the support I received when issues arised due to this policy. A friend in need is a friend indeed.
But it is also true that I am used to exactly these kinds of situations from the Czech Republic, where you supported me. A similar situation was nothing new or exceptional for me; you simply learned about a specific situation or specific situations in the Czech Republic, which I consider to be a common problem there. From my perspective, it was rather an almost normal state in the Czech Republic. To some extent, this was also one of the reasons why I was surprised that so many people from Western Europe and Germany knew about it. And it also showed me how different society is in other countries. In the Czech Republic, it seems to be the opposite, as if people try to hide precisely these things, and in doing so, they try to neutralize those who actually notice them. But the truth is, no one can to neutralize people like you are. And the fight for hiding the reality is lost.
AI Living Standard Analysis:
With the policies of ANO or parties like Motoristé sobě, it is practically impossible to catch up to the level of Western European economies.
• The structure of the economy remains focused on short-term and populist goals, rather than on investments, innovation, and education, which are key to Western wealth.
• Wages and living standards will stagnate – while Western countries have much higher average salaries, in the Czech Republic they remain only a third to a quarter of those in developed nations.
• Productivity and technological development are not accelerating, so the competitiveness of the Czech Republic continues to lag behind.
• Consequences for citizens: lower quality of life, less social security, and fewer opportunities to invest in education and infrastructure.
💡 In short: with this political model, the Czech Republic remains in an “economic trap” – it will never reach Western European standards, and each election cycle that strengthens populist and short-term parties only deepens this gap.