Reality Above One
Because I deal with strong topics, I sometimes think about—and ask myself—whom I actually want to address. I write quite a lot of “complaints” about things that statistics themselves sometimes contradict. At times I don’t even know why those statistics are misguided, even though they are refutable.
I’m forced to think about who or what my writing is also for comes from something I wouldn’t have thought would happen a few years ago.
Sometimes I also put something into ChatGPT, and the AI responds based on general statistics. After a while of chatting, the AI starts to shift its position, because I begin to counter those general statistics with my deeper investigations, arising from experiences and more in-depth data’s. Sometimes the debates with ChatGPT are intense: I describe my experiences, then I start to confirm them myself with deeper statistics.
In my view, I address people who are already being addressed—people who showed interest themselves when they didn’t understand the conflict. And it keeps being that way: they are interested…
I also started writing because there was something to respond to, due to that interest. This in itself says something about different environments. For it, there are so many reasons that they are hard to put into words.
I also address the other side…
In my own way, I see different kinds of understanding: on one side, knowledge of reality—ultimately, it is knowledge of one’s own reality. Yeah, knowledge of one’s own reality 😄. In the more or in the Western one, no one is surprised by their own reality. On the other side, someone is surprised, doesn’t understand, or even cannot believe that such a reality exists… One asks oneself: why?
I have had more real conflicts as well when defending the more Western part, purely because of personal experience—because of interest itself that arises from these communities. Sometimes someone also used this as their reason for why I should leave… One is then surprised that some people are unwilling to accept a reality that exists, simply because it is shaped by different communities of people. In the core, someone does not align with their idea of how the world works elsewhere, and by trying to eliminate one, these societies or the one cannot be destroyed… The world is not about the one.
It’s like when I say that at certain genre events, ordinary people go, and that makes it mainstream, while something can be underground for ordinary people. There are different perspectives on the matter itself—how things are understood in different contexts, why, and who these “normal” people are, what normality means elsewhere. I don’t even want to reveal my own idea of what is considered ordinary somewhere. Maybe I’d have to blush.
From what I’ve written, another of my experiences also follows. I encounter someone’s who try to deny reality. For instance, someone don’t have to know it in its entirety, because they don’t know the environment I’m talking about; nevertheless, this reality exists…
By denying reality, nothing can be changed.
The reality will continue, because it is unchangeable due to the values of the given societies. Ironic is that this reality exists and will have to be faced, even if someone tries to deny it. Denial is useless. And denial actually reinforces doubts even more—it deepens it…
Yeah, there are contradictions in the perception how the world ought to work 👐
