2026-08-29
Heute War Einfach Ein Besonderer Tag.
2026-08-28
Strasbourg vs. Amsterdam
Perhaps this opinion of mine will surprise some people.
Most people associate canals and a beautiful historic city center with Amsterdam in the Netherlands. And the truth is that Amsterdam’s historic center is beautiful. For me, Amsterdam is at its best during Christmas. The combination of Amsterdam’s culture, architecture, Christmas decorations, and people creates a genuinely magical Christmas atmosphere. In my opinion, Amsterdam at Christmas is easily among the most beautiful cities in Europe.
However, I also have to mention Strasbourg in France. Strasbourg can compete with Amsterdam in many ways.
Strasbourg has a beautiful historic center, with numerous picturesque canals running through the city, much like Amsterdam. It is also particularly beautiful during the Christmas season. Cycling is also very common in Strasbourg.
What makes Strasbourg stand out for me is also its Christmas decoration. Much of it is unique and, in some cases, even has a historic or non-commercial character. The decorations are everywhere, creating a distinctive Christmas atmosphere that is difficult to find elsewhere.
For me, Strasbourg is one of the most beautiful cities in Europe. I sometimes find myself comparing it with Amsterdam, particularly when it comes to their historic centers. Strasbourg’s historic center shares surprisingly similar characteristics with Amsterdam’s, especially its combination of historic architecture, canals, and a strong sense of place.
Strasbourg may even be a safer city than Amsterdam—at least when it comes to homicides. There do not appear to be official homicide statistics specifically for Strasbourg; the French Ministry of the Interior’s statistical office mainly publishes figures for France as a whole. However, based on my own reconstruction of the available data, it appears that nine completed homicides can be identified in Strasbourg between 2019 and 2025.
And the nights in Strasbourg are quiet. During the night, you hardly see anyone in the city center.2026-08-27
ChatGPT can’t see
One of the reasons why can’t rely on ChatGPT’s answers
![]() |
| Things that ChatGPT can’t see. |
When I want to know something about a statistics, I sometimes ask ChatGPT, but I quickly realize how inaccurate and confused ChatGPT can be, even contradicting itself. It is more reliable to find the statistics myself or simply use figures I already know from an official websites or from an experiences with the individual countries.
2026-08-26
Click Twice: More valuable ads
This model is beginning to face increasing pressure from regulators. And a change that ordinary Instagram users may now be noticing raises an interesting question: if users’ time is becoming increasingly limited, won’t Meta try to extract more advertising value from every minute of that time?
Meta is heavily dependent on advertising. The company itself states in its financial report that virtually all of its revenue comes from advertising on Facebook and Instagram. In the second quarter of 2026, the company’s total revenue reached $60.8 billion, representing a 28% year-over-year increase. Advertising revenue alone increased by 27%.
Even more important, however, is how Meta is achieving that growth.
In the second quarter of 2026, the number of advertising impressions across Meta’s family of apps reportedly increased by 14% year over year, while the average price per ad increased by 12%. Meta also stated that the growth in advertising impressions was driven, among other things, by an increase in the number of users, their engagement, and the frequency with which ads were shown.
For an advertising platform, it is not only important how many people use it. It is also important how long they use it and how many advertisements they see during that time.
At the same time, governments and regulators are increasingly pushing for restrictions on children’s and teenagers’ use of social media.
A particularly significant example emerged just now. On 26 August 2026, Meta reached a broad agreement with nearly all U.S. states in disputes concerning the safety and addictive nature of Facebook and Instagram for young users. The agreement reportedly includes, among other things, a default two-hour daily limit, nighttime restrictions between midnight and 6 a.m., and additional limitations on notifications and platform use. Among American teenagers aged 13–17, approximately 61% reportedly use Instagram.
The American law/settlement itself is unlikely to dramatically threaten Meta’s overall advertising revenue, because it applies only to U.S. users aged 13–17. However, it represents an important precedent. If similar restrictions expand to other countries and age groups, the economic significance of users’ lost time could become much greater.
This is not an isolated American case. Regulation of young people’s access to social media is expanding in other countries as well. Australia, for example, became the first country in the world to introduce a ban on social media for users under the age of 16, while similar proposals and debates are also taking place across Europe and other parts of the world.
If a particular group of users is allowed to spend less time on Instagram, or is prevented from using the platform altogether, the number of opportunities to show advertisements to that group naturally decreases.
Meta itself reportedly warns in its financial documents that an increasing number of laws are restricting or prohibiting the provision of its services to younger users, and that regulatory changes may affect its advertising business.
In recent weeks, some Instagram users have noticed another change. As of today, these notifications are appearing for more users. Advertisements have begun appearing directly in the Following tab—the section of the app traditionally used to browse content from accounts that users actually follow.
For a long time, Following was seen as a way to avoid part of the algorithmically recommended content and focus only on accounts that a person had personally chosen to follow.
Imagine a user who previously spent two hours a day on Instagram. During those two hours, they might have seen a certain number of advertisements. If regulation or parental controls reduce that usage to one hour, Meta suddenly has only half the amount of time in which it can display ads to that user.
Increasing the frequency of advertisements is one of the factors Meta itself mentions when explaining the growth in advertising impressions.
Meta competes for the user’s attention. Attention can be monetized through advertising. If the regulatory environment attempts to reduce the amount of that attention, its economic value to the platform may actually increase. Every minute of usage becomes more valuable. It then becomes logical to search for new advertising spaces, improve the efficiency of the advertising system, increase advertising prices, or display more ads within the same amount of time.
Indeed, in the second quarter of 2026, Meta simultaneously recorded a 14% increase in advertising impressions and a 12% increase in the average price per advertisement. Advertising revenue therefore grew significantly faster than the number of daily active people itself, which increased by only 3% year over year.
This suggests that the growth of Meta’s advertising business is not based solely on acquiring more users. Regulation may have a paradoxical effect. Regulators want people—especially children and teenagers—to spend less time on social media. Meta, on the other hand, has an economic incentive to maximize the value of users’ time, because advertising is its primary source of revenue.
The result does not necessarily have to be fewer advertisements. It may be exactly the opposite: less user time is greater pressure to monetize every minute → more advertising impressions is higher advertising density
It can therefore be argued that all of these developments are acting on the same economic issue: how much attention Meta can obtain from the user, and how much of that attention it can convert into advertising revenue.
If the world truly continues limiting the amount of time that young people, for example, are allowed to spend on social media, it may eventually turn out that the biggest change to Instagram will not be less social media—but a higher value placed on every minute that users still spend there.
A main source: Meta’s Q2 2026 Financial Report — Advertising Revenue and Ad Impressions
A inspiration for tittle "Click Twice" is song with "Click Twice" by King Tetrus.
2026-08-25
to Keep Your Face Covered II.
Following up on the previous article, here are some additional arguments:
Behind A Mask
If the legal framework justifies a ban on covering the face on the grounds that the face must be visible or identifiable, it should be able to explain why it permits other material ways of covering or masking the face that can significantly alter its appearance.
Make-up constitutes a material, physical layer applied to the face, including prosthetic makeup. In this sense, it can be considered a form of physically covering or masking the face, even though it does not involve covering it with fabric.
If the purpose of the ban is to preserve a person’s identifiability, physical visibility of the face cannot be confused with the identifiability of the person. A face can be completely uncovered while its appearance can simultaneously be altered through prosthetic and cosmetic means to such an extent that the person is not recognizable to the public.
That in itself, and perhaps even more so when combined with different-colored contact lenses or a wig.The second part of the article looks at
the Dutch model.
The Dutch model directly supports the argument I made in the previous article: if there is genuinely a need to identify a person, it is not necessary for their face to be continuously visible in public. The Dutch government explicitly states that face coverings may be worn on the street and that the police may ask a person to uncover their face if this is necessary for identification.
The following text is taken directly from the website of the Dutch government: (1)
Partial ban on face-covering clothing
In the Netherlands, people have the right to dress as they wish, regardless of what others think about it. In some locations, it is important for social safety and service provision that people can look at and recognize one another. The government therefore prohibits clothing that completely covers the face in certain locations: on public transport, in education, healthcare, and in government buildings.
Looking at and recognizing one another
In some places, it is necessary for people to look at and communicate with one another. This is important for providing good services. For the safety of visitors, patients, and staff, it is important to be able to recognize who is in the building or on public transport.
Locations where face-covering clothing is prohibited
In everyday language, people also sometimes use the terms burqa ban or niqab ban. The prohibition under the Partial Ban on Face-Covering Clothing Act applies in several places, namely:
educational institutions;
healthcare institutions;
public transport;
government buildings.
This includes, for example, a full-face motorcycle helmet, a balaclava, or a niqab. The ban on face-covering clothing applies to everyone. This includes visitors, employees, teachers, students, and patients.
Face-covering clothing on the street
In other places and on the street, people are still allowed to wear face-covering clothing. The police may ask a person to remove the face covering if this is necessary for identification.
Exceptions to the ban
There are several exceptions to the ban:
People may wear face-covering clothing if it is necessary to protect their bodies. An example is a welder’s safety mask.
The ban does not apply to clients, patients, or their visitors in residential areas of healthcare institutions where people stay for longer periods of time. For example, a senior citizens’ residential complex. The residential area is considered the private domain of clients or patients.
Face-covering clothing is permitted during festive and cultural activities taking place at a location where the ban applies. The clothing must be appropriate according to social norms and is permitted only when the clothing is an inseparable part of the celebration. For example, masks or other face coverings during a Sinterklaas celebration or carnival party at a school. Or a bridal veil during a wedding at the town hall.
Source: (1) Gedeeltelijk verbod gezichtsbedekkende kleding
Another point towards female Muslims is that there are probably only about two known cases in Europe in which face covering with burqa was used in connection with an attempted murder or murder. In one case, a woman disguised herself in a burqa so that she would not be recognized, and in the other case, a niqab was used as a disguise during an attempted contract killing. However, it is crucial to point out one thing: in these cases, these were not Muslim women who normally wore a burqa or niqab for religious reasons. Rather, religious clothing was used as a disguise in order to conceal the person’s identity. These cases may therefore show that covering the face can make it more difficult to identify a perpetrator, but they are not in themselves evidence that Muslim women who wear the niqab for religious reasons pose a security risk.




